Saturday, January 3, 2026

What Does God Say About Israel? Jack Hibbs and Amir Tsarfati

 Happy New Year. Here is one of the best videos I have watched regarding Israel. When Amir Tsarfati speaks I just want to hear what he has to say. What a gifted speaker and so much knowledge. I am no expert and listening to this one is better than me just writing it out. I am tempted to listen again and try to write it all out, but so many truth bombs that it would take me days to write it out. I wanted to share the video because he explains everything so well that I can even understand it. The layers of Bible prophecy, Earthly timeline, Jews, Gentiles, and the end times. So much packed into an hour. Check out the video and learn more than you knew yesterday.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1ezTDkszcU

Friday, January 2, 2026

Hillsdale College Lesson 9: The Importance of Literature

 Lesson 9: The Importance of Literature 

-reading should not be the only reason we read is to consume information, but we should be reading because it gives something back to us as the reader 

-K-12 education: the role that literature will play in helping to shape the habit of mind for our children, perhaps even a disposition of their soul towards literature itself


Why study literature?

-As teachers, we need to ask students why are we doing this?

-Why reader Homer, Virgil, Chaucer, 

-there is something human in all these ages and cultures 

-when you open a book, it is a conversation between the author and reader 

-encounter the ideas that have shaped civilizations, theological ideas, philosophical ideas, and that sense of wonder 

-literature can open to learning something of themselves 


****we read literature to enter the world of the writers like Homer, Shakespeare, and Dostoevsky


-we read it to be able to engage in their own moral or maybe even their immoral imagination

-we try to encounter what it is they’re wrestling with, with regards to the human soul, to the interaction between human person and human person, to relationships of the divine and the human 

-we play by their rules in this universe 

-we may not like their rules and the universe which they present to us

-we learn by them: poetic techniques

-we learn how they craft their stories 

-this brings us into such intimacy with these authors 

-it transforms the literature when you learn how these poets, how these novelists, how these playwrights craft their stories

-you are no longer just encountering a world in Homer and Dostoevsky, Shakespear, in Julian of Norwich

-you are just not encountering a world, but you are encountering a human person 

-not just the author, but the literature takes on a face, so the literature itself has almost a personality as it tries to express itself to you

-the beauty: a piece of literature is somewhat like a river as it is always changing, always moving, always something new in the bends like a river

-it expands to more than just a world or universe, but it’s like a human person that you enter into a relationship with it as it changes along with you

Ex. the Odysseus I met when I was 20 is very different from  the Odysseus I met when I was 40

-literature changes, why?, because we change  so we become close to this or that piece of literature

-we need to dig deeper than just the big ideas

Ex. AI pulls up the big ideas when you google Shakespeare 

Ex. do we just learn big ideas to make for great classroom debates to just discuss those big ideas


How to study literature? (what is our approach to literature)

The negative way:

-these are foundational, but as secondary

-don’t study literature to see the work as a historical or cultural artifact

-we don’t study Homer to learn something about ancient Greece 

-we don’t study Shakespeare simply to learn something about Renaissance England 

-we don’t study Dostoevsky to learn something about 19th century Russia

-we gain insights into these historical time periods and these cultures 

-one can learn something about that piece of literature through studying 19th century Russia

-literature should not be isolated in a vacuum

-there is nothing wrong with learning from culture or its historical setting 

-these should not be the primary reason we study literature because it is not simply an object of history or object of culture


Step1:

-not a historical/cultural artifact 


Step 2:

-don’t approach literature as a foundational way or fundamental approach 


***Our primary reason for studying literature is not to reflect on our own culture or get students to reflect on themselves or their own lives 


-literature doesn’t become relevant if it’s all about me 

-today: what can I learn about myself, what can I learn about my own contemporary culture in reading Shakespear’s Merchant of Venice

-mistake: teachers go to the historical or cultural answer to justify reading literature because it provides immediate significance like a wellspring of information about ancient Greece 

-mistake: teachers point to learning about yourselves, like relating it to your own lives; a fight scene to the students own family fights Ex. King Lear teaches about sibling rivalry, family hatred, jealousy, etc…

-learning about yourself in literature is the cause for reading literature not the primary reason for reading literature 


Step 3:

-we do not read literature for a fundamental reason of a moral lesson from a piece of literature

-we do not read Homer’s Odyssey as if it were a fable

-literature is not there to instruct us on how to live that good life 

-literature does touch on moral and ethical decisions you may make on a day-to-day basis are informed by pieces of literature 

-literature doesn’t not pull out of you a personal or contemporary cultural reflection 


How to teach students to read literature:

-important to define those big ideas for students, but the focus/attention should be the way the literature presents and wrestles with the ideas

-we have to ask questions about recurring images, repetitions of lines

-we need to ask about the details in a poem, a text, and why it is arranged in this way

-we have to respect these works by engaging in the particulars and in the specifics 

-Poet: the wonder comes in the craft of the composer

-if a piece of literature moves you then you enter into the wonder, the importance of literature, 

 -***A real human person with a real human brain and a real human soul produced this, wrestled with him or herself in producing this and it is there in that work that what we want to encounter, that kind of poetic vision of the author 


****Question: How do these authors move us so? Not because of the big ideas

-but, because of the use of the language which they use to express whatever it is those characters are going through

-it is difficult to relate to a historical time period, or to relate it to themselves and their own experience

-we need to teach students to be actively silent and pensive

-to read a passage and then reread it and meditate upon it 

-we want to create in our students a habit of always thinking that there is something more 

-ask the question: What is the author doing here?

-teach students how to read through texts 

-read works seriously and deliberately  because you are entering a world of wonder

-wonder = habit of the mind and the disposition of the soul  

-reading a book should not just be to finish a book report 

-reading  takes listening and contemplation

-remind students that I am the teacher, but I am going to get out of the way of the piece of literature 

-assignments and assessment should teach students to wrestle with Homer

-thinking through literature takes patience on the part of students

-contemplating literature takes hard work 

-it takes training students to sit in the silence and allow the piece of literature to speak not being spoonfeed knowledge by the teacher 

-text: as students push into the literature; the literature pushes back like a conversation or a relationship 

-there are very few black and white characters in literature 

-we can’t dictate what a piece of literature will give to each of us 


Teacher:

-must also wrestle with the texts

-dedicate yourself to rereading the texts with your students

-keep literature fresh so wrestle with it immediately

-if these are real human persons, turns out you have to talk to them, and allow them to talk back to you

-how do you explain to students that there is a habit of thoughtfulness, habit of meditation if as teachers we are not doing the same 

-we need to model for them what a careful reader looks like

-they aren’t going to know who to read literature until you teach them those skills

-then you can go into why we study literature 

-if we aren’t modeling for them they will not grow as students 

Ex. Big Ideas:

-homecoming in the Odyssey

-homecoming in the Wind in the Willows

-now let us enter into the world of wonder

-work through it with each of these characters


Odyssey:

-Poetic level the author reunites the two characters 

-they both weep-Odyssey was gone for 20 years-weeps over the lost time


Wind in the Willows:

-Mole and rat are returning home 

-mole finds his old home

-mole reflects on his home-the home was missing him

-loyalty to his friend rat-left his home again to be with rat 

-book about friendship and loyalty 


Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Hillsdale College Lesson 8: The Teaching of Science and the Problem with STEM

 Lesson 8: The Teaching of Science and the Problem with STEM

-schools emphasize a kind of artificially trying to draw students into the STEM fields

-artificial generating interest with the background motivation having to do with these will be things that they will need for their jobs

-this leads to losing the sense of wonder, and the sense of awe that should be there in science investigations

-science needs to be addressed like poetry because in science this background idea that it is necessary now in the 21st century global economy which serves to dry out the subject 


Study of the natural sciences:

-science fits into a classical model of education

-classical education: 

Dr. Terence Moore, principal of the Atlanta Classical Academy, wrote an essay entitled “A Classical Education for Modern Times.” 

“Language and literature, history and government, mathematics and the sciences, music and art in a coherent and orderly program.” 

***can access on Charter School Initiative on the Hillsdale College website

***Hillsdale: education in the traditional arts but translated into K-12 context 


4 distinctive characteristics of classical education: framework:

1-that it values knowledge for its own sake

2-upholds the standards of correctness, logic, beauty, weightiness, and truth intrinsic to the liberal arts 

3-demand’s moral virtue of its adherents

4-prepares human beings to assume their places as responsible citizens in the political order


Why do we include the natural sciences as part of a classical education?

-can we justify teaching science in this context

-can teaching science enrich or contribute to the goals of the classical academy


How  scientific knowledge is generally viewed within our culture, and also within education:

-culture: impression that scientific knowledge is valued by the public 

-personal: respect knowledge gained by scientific investigation

Pew Research Center entitled “Public and Scientist’s views on Science and Society”

-shows science is generally esteemed, respected, and appreciated by the public 

-people do disagree with specific scientific findings but appreciate the sciences

-scientific knowledge is associated with objectivity 

-people tend to think of scientific truth claims as having an objective nature

-people see other areas of being opinion-based 

-sciences based in facts and objectivity

sciences are seen as a valid distinction over other subjects 

-the esteem of sciences is there is a close association in people’s mind between scientific knowledge and the development of life improving technologies 

-the idea that science is very useful to the society 


K-12 education: 

-do you think scientific knowledge is valued in education

-policy level: improving standards in education, science is included as paramount importance 

-there is a high value placed on scientific literacy for students, more so than on cultural literacy 

-high importance of getting the so-called STEM fields right

-STEM = Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math education

-latin, art, music, have to fight for a kind of respect or be completely removed from the conversation

-STEM is being pushed as critically important in education

-the main reason STEM is pushed is jobs

-Ex. Home page: STEM Education Coalition 

-U.S. are functioning as a STEM workforce pipeline 


“The central mission of the STEM education coalition is to inform federal and state policymakers on the critical role that science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, STEM, education plays in US competitiveness and future economic prosperity,” 

-there is a checklist on their website 

1-STEM education must be elevated as a national priority

2-our nation’s future economic prosperity is closely linked with student success in the STEM fields

3-the US must expand the capacity and diversity of the STEM workforce pipeline


Ex. whitehouse.gov has a report written by the National Science and Technology Council Committee on STEM Education

-it is a five-year strategic plan for federal STEM education 

-May 2013 was distributed to Congress to fund STEM education

-1st reason critical reason to invest 

“The jobs of the future are STEM jobs. THe demand for professionals in STEM fields is projected to outpace the supply of trained workers and professionals. Additionally, STEM competencies are increasingly required for workers both within and outside specific STEM occupations.”


How effective it is for the government to centrally plan science education in America?

-Is there a crisis of a shortage of workers in the STEM fields?

-Article by Robert Charette, IEEE Spectrum website, “The STEM Crisis is a Myth.”

-Politicians speak often about the connection between Stem education and jobs in the global economy

-main idea is the technical knowledge holds the key to economic progress so why the primary reason behind the emphasis on the STEM fields

-this is a utilitarian approach to push these subjects because we think they will be useful in an economic kind of a sense 


***this utilitarian approach fails our children, and often leads actually to a loss of interest by students in math and science


-education is much more, much richer and deeper, than just preparing students to work in the global economy


How should we study science?

-acquisition of so much knowledge and so much power

-culture: there is a suspicion of science based perceived conflicts with religious or political views 

-so today, there is distrust of science, based on the fear that as the sphere of scientific knowledge increases, the spheres of religious or political views shrink 

-today, there are thoughts that science is inherently antithetical to religious thought

-polar opposite response to science that validates the first view which is material reductionism or scientism 

-scientism: (New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought)

“The view that the characteristic inductive methods of the natural sciences are the only source of genuine factual knowledge, and in particular that they alone can yield true knowledge about man and society.”

-idea that people are so overwhelmed by the success of science that they go on to declare that science is the only valid way of knowing

-neither are appropriate so our response to science:

“First, we should have respect and a sense of awe at the knowledge that has been gained. We are right to be impressed, and even overwhelmed, by how well we have come to know our universe in this going–it’s not complete understanding, but in this ongoing project, a lot of progress has been made. But should be tempered with an understanding of the limits of science.”

-it is a mistake to declare that it’s the only valid way of knowing

-Book, The Faith of Scientists in Their Own Words, edited by Nancy Frankenberry

Quote by John Polkinghorne: 

“Although we are rightly impressed by the many things that science can account for satisfactorily, we should also recognize that this great success has been purchased by a degree of modesty of ambition. Science limits itself to considering only certain kinds of experience.”


-we need to understand that science is a self-limiting enterprise, does not seek to answer all questions, and is limited to the study of physical phenomena



Why should we study science (include it in our educational program)?

-a central fact is that science is a tremendously successful enterprise 

-systematic investigation of the natural world over the past 300 years has yielded a staggering amount of understanding of the way nature works and control over nature

-science is an important part of the human account of reality

-science shouldn’t elevate it so high as to push away the other ways of knowing

-in education we should be pointing children towards what is good, true, and beautiful

-understanding the natural world is important but not exhaustive 

-study science because it contributes to understanding ourselves, our surroundings

-science addresses deep questions asked by humans, many asked in antiquity

Ex. What is the nature of light?

Ex. What is the nature of magnetism?

Ex. What is the nature of the heavenly bodies?

Ex. What is the nature of disease?

-start looking at the big scientific questions, at times they are difficult questions to solve

-investigating questions 

-Chapter from book, The Polkinghorne Reader, selection of writings from the physicist and Anglican priest John Polkinghorne, “The Nature of Science.”

-Polkinghorne argues that the actual practice of science is more subtle, and more complex, and more interesting than simplified account of the scientific method that’s typically presented

-he states the critical role of personal judgement in the actual practice of science 

-the criteria that we use to judge between competing theories involving the role of making personal judgments 

-personal judgments by experts exercised with caution and submitted to the community

-science is a personal endeavor by humans 

-scientists want to discover that the world is 

-he criticizes the views of positivism and idealism 

Critical Realism:

“Science is not different in kind from other kinds of human understanding involving evaluation by the knower, but only different in degree.”


***science is an intellectual cousin of religion


“Science and theology are both concerned with the search for truth. In consequence, they compliment each other, rather rather than contract one another.”


-the two disciplines focus on different dimensions but they share a common conviction that there is truth to be sought.”


-he is speaking of science and religion

-but, this can be said about science and humanities

-both important approaches to seeking what is true, but from different angles/dimensions of truth

-when put together gives a fuller picture and just different ways of knowing

-science should be included in a classical curriculum 

-science seeks what is true about the world 

-it leads to understanding the world


***learning about science will be part of what elevates the students’ minds toward self-government, and the ability to participate in democracy 


-learning the fundamental ideas of science, and looking at the historical development of science

-students can thoughtfully consider awesome scientific issues that the public tends to not do very well with

-Ex. Evolution or global climate change or the safety of vaccines, or the safety of genetically modified foods, or other issues that face our society 


What should science the science program look like?

What are the hallmarks of science in classical education?

-1st classical education was knowledge for its own sake 

-1st characteristic of science education is scientific knowledge for its own sake 

-we study science because it answers questions that we’re curious about and seeks what is true

-2nd is analogous to having to do with high standards so approach of excellence and rigor within all of the areas 

-the idea is high standards such as attention to detail, careful work, careful observations, and also the goal that each and every student will grow in their understanding of the natural world, and will continue to work hard and improve 

-not taught to students that self-identify as being interested in science, or wanting to go into STEM fields

-3rd is historical context because science is a human endeavor 

-humans are curious 

-humans want to show the humanity of it

-there is also a narrative -humans are interested in story

-there is a narrative aspect of science 

-look at personalities of scientists, their circumstances, both personal and political circumstances, friendships that they had, rivalries they had that influence the discoveries that they make, and the role that lucky accidents play in important discoveries

-to provide context can humanize science and make the study of science more interesting 

-gives students a realistic view on the way that science happens by studying the way that it has happened in the past

-4th characteristic of science education in this classical context is philosophy of science 

-not explicitly studying the philosophy of science, but impression about he way science fits in to the overall project of taking lots of different courses


***students should begin to understand the self-imposed limitations of science. Science is not well-equipped to answer every important question that can be asked 

-science cannot explain beauty or the meaning of beauty 


***students graduating high school should be able to respond thoughtfully to the claim that science has rendered all religious belief obsolete 


-develop within students a healthy skepticism 

-not to create cynical skeptics, but to create students who have practiced weighing claims based on evidence, so have a healthy skepticism where they ask the question, what is the evidence for thinking that a certain claim might be true

-not to just accept any claims coming at them


**ask why we believe that this is true 


-the characteristic is reading and writing in the context of science education

-reading and writing are very primary tools of learning and communicating 

-students get the impression that writing well is important in an English class, but it’s not important when you go to other types of classes 

-clear communication through writing, and explaining things in a clear and concise way is important in science

-reading and writing skills are necessary within science courses

-science has challenging readings to develop skills in reading 

-classical science education that we live in an orderly, complicated, surprising, but orderly and intelligible universe that can be understood through careful systemic investigation

-science is a part of the innate human desire to know and understand 

-science as closely related to addressing what we might call the big questions

-not separate = humanities. Literature,  philosophy, theology from science and mathematics 

-Arts: students addressing deep, interesting questions that appeal naturally to human curiosity

-Science: sterile with abstract facts, and with numbers, and quantifying things, but not seen as related to big ideas that people find interesting 


***students need them all: science is addressing big questions that appeal to innate human curiosity in a similar way to–like what goes into the humanities 


-it is seen in studying historical context when you look at scientists in the past, which reveals the passion behind the people, perseverance of the people

-not looking to invent a new technology, but looking to understand the natural world, and understand the way that it works (historical stories)

-the enthusiasm of the teacher : actually impressed and interested in the ideas they are discussing with their students 


Goals for our students over 12 years of studying science:

-build towards the kind of not end product, but the final goal when students walk out of their K-12 education

-1st: the content of science 

-students should have an accurate understanding of the primary models, and theories, and laws of physical science 

understand not comprehensively, but understand the important fundamental ideas from biology, chemistry, physics, Earth science, and astronomy 

-2nd: accurate understanding of the process of science

-through own experience with hands-on scientific investigation doing labs and activities 

-can get historical hands-on examples of the process of science

-3rd:  develop a deep appreciation of science

-students should be impressed and even moved by what they can learn about the natural world works 

-ignite student to learn in many different ways: English, Chemistry, Philosophy, & Calculus 

-4th: ability to write clearly and concisely (starts in elementary school years)

-with that students need to be able to speak through effective communication skills

-in science class students can present what they learned: small research projects or processes of the lab work completed 

-5th: can do careful experiments and careful observation from those who have been taught proper lab techniques, good habits in the experimental side of scientific investigation

-6th: teaches problem solving skills

-there is a close association between mathematics and science

-mathematics is one of the important languages of science

-develop in students the ability to apply the mathematical tools that they learn to problems in science

-not just a a kind of technical perspective but the ability to think about what the mathematical application means

-lean what equations actually mean physically

-needs to start in kindergarten: reasonable answers and correct units 

Ex. students will solve an equation, and give an answer that just a moment's reflection will show that the numerical value of the answer is not reasonable, given the context of the problem

Ex. idea of attaching the proper units to the numbers, the unit being just as important as the numerical value of the number 

****the goals will culminate in high school, but the foundation of these goals is laid in the elementary years

-ironically, science is put on the backburner in the elementary years

***Problem: too much emphasis put on standardized test in reading and writing

-recommended to read and write in a broad coverage of topics in science in the elementary years (not just life science, but chemistry, physics, and earth science)

-this allows for elementary student to get exposure to content areas and the process of science

-elementary students develop the habits of careful and hard work which are necessary for success in science

-tap into the narrative quality of scientific development in elementary school 

Ex. reading biographies of important scientists and making connections to history 

-in elementary school is where we cultivate an appreciation for nature on the part of students 

-students naturally appreciate nature

-students are impressed by wildlife

Ex. curious about  sunsets and the moon

Ex. teach them to be curious and appreciate what bacteria and viruses are

Ex. teach them to be curious that matter consists of atoms and molecules 

-by studying nature in the elementary grades students will start to actually see for themselves the order that exists in nature by categorizing things, classifying things 

-students start to see order, and patterns, and a sense to the way we organize scientific ideas

-students being taught these skills in elementary schools will be less intimidated as they increase in complexity later

-science is an excellent context for the development of math, reading, and writing skills for elementary students 


***K-12 education is saturated with emphasis on standards, benchmarks, assessments, and career readiness 


***We should be fostering curiosity and wonder, encouraging hard and careful work, and molding deep thinkers, even intellectuals 


***1st goal is not technical experts who can help with global economic competition, but rather liberally educated citizens